Salman Rushdie tells us that he wrote Knife, his account of his near-murder by the hands of a 24-year-old Shia Muslim man from New Jersey, for 2 causes: as a result of he needed to take care of “the elephant-in-the-room” earlier than he might return to writing about anything, and to know what the assault was about. The primary purpose suggests one thing admirable, even exceptional, in Rushdie’s character, a willpower to persist as a novelist and a person within the face of terror. After The Satanic Verses introduced down a dying sentence from Ayatollah Khomeini in 1989, which despatched Rushdie into hiding, he stored writing novels and refused to be outlined by the fatwa. When, a long time later, on August 12, 2022, the sentence was almost executed on a stage on the Chautauqua Establishment, in upstate New York, the place Rushdie was about to have interaction in a dialogue of creative freedom, he needed to will himself by way of an agonizing restoration—ache, despair, disfigurement, bodily and psychological remedy, the terrible recognition that the fatwa was not behind him in spite of everything. Then, to jot down this e-book, he needed to stare exhausting, with one eye now gone, on the crime—even, ultimately, to revisit the scene—as a result of it stood in the best way of the fiction author’s instruments, reminiscence, and creativeness.
“One thing immense and non-fictional had occurred to me,” Rushdie writes. Telling that story “can be my method of proudly owning what had occurred, taking cost of it, making it mine, refusing to be a mere sufferer. I’d reply violence with artwork.” Probably the most highly effective manifestation of this artwork in Knife is Rushdie’s description—exact and with out self-pity—of the value he pays for his phrases. The knife blows to his face, neck, chest, stomach, and limbs are savage and really almost kill him. He loses the sight in his proper eye, which needs to be sewn shut, and most of the usage of his left hand. He’s beset with nightmares and intervals of profound gloom. The resilience he musters—aided by the love of his spouse and household—is susceptible, ornery, witty, self-centered, and heroic. It has made him a scarred image of free expression—or, as he acidly places it, “a form of virtuous liberty-loving Barbie doll.” He would quite be well-known for his books, however he accepts his destiny.
By Salman Rushdie
The opposite purpose for writing Knife—to know why he got here inside millimeters of shedding his life—is extra elusive. The “suspect,” Hadi Matar, dedicated the crime earlier than about 1,000 witnesses and subsequently confessed in a jailhouse interview to the New York Publish; nonetheless, he has pleaded not responsible. The trial hasn’t occurred but, and actually has been postponed by this e-book’s publication—Matar’s lawyer argued that Rushdie’s written account constitutes proof that his shopper ought to be capable to see. Matar’s story appears to be the all-too-familiar one among a thwarted loner on a wonderful mission. He travels from New Jersey to Lebanon to see his estranged father and returns modified—withdrawn and indignant at his mom for not elevating him as a strict Muslim. He tries studying to field and watches movies in his mom’s basement, together with just a few of Rushdie’s lectures. He reads a few pages of The Satanic Verses and decides that the creator is evil. He hears that Rushdie will probably be talking at Chautauqua and stalks him there. Matar is a Lee Harvey Oswald for the age of spiritual terrorism and YouTube.
Rushdie isn’t a lot fascinated with him. He gained’t title Matar, calling him solely “the A.,” for assailant, ass, and some different A phrases. All through the e-book, Rushdie expresses scorn for or indifference towards his attacker, calling him “merely irrelevant to me.” Nonetheless, he makes one sustained try to know Matar: “I’m obliged to contemplate the solid of thoughts of the person who was prepared to homicide me.” A journalist might need gone concerning the activity by interviewing individuals who knew Matar and making an attempt to reconstruct his life. Oddly, Rushdie doesn’t point out the names—maybe as a result of he by no means realized them—of the viewers members who rushed the stage and stopped the assault, and he provides docs within the trauma middle impersonal titles akin to “Dr. Staples” and “Dr. Eye.” Provided that he devoted the e-book to “the women and men who saved my life,” these omissions are placing and counsel a restrict to Rushdie’s willingness to discover the trauma. In any case, he’s a novelist, and his method of understanding is thru creativeness. He conjures a collection of dialogues between himself and his attacker, however Rushdie’s questions—Socratic makes an attempt to guide Matar to suppose extra deeply about his hateful beliefs—elicit temporary retorts, lengthier insults, or silence. Maybe there actually isn’t very a lot to say, and the dialog is inconclusive. It lasts so long as it does solely as a result of the person being questioned is trapped inside Rushdie’s thoughts.
The novelist might need gained extra perception by imagining Matar as a personality in a narrative, seeing the occasion from the attacker’s standpoint, the best way Don DeLillo writes of the Kennedy assassination from Oswald’s in Libra. However that will have given Matar far an excessive amount of presence in Rushdie’s thoughts. His capability to outlive as a author and a human being is dependent upon not without end being a person who was knifed, as he had earlier insisted on not being only a novelist below a dying sentence. If Rushdie’s causes for telling this story are to maneuver on and to know, this primary purpose is extra essential to him than the second and, in a method, precludes it.
Again in 1989, the fatwa hardly turned Rushdie right into a hero. Loads of Western politicians and writers, together with thousands and thousands of Muslims around the globe, put the blame on him for insensitivity if not apostasy. The knife assault was completely different—it drew almost common outrage and sympathy. Maybe the horror of an tried homicide overcame any squeamishness about offending non secular emotions. Maybe the statute of limitations on blasphemy had run out, the fatwa too way back to depend. Maybe there’s been an excessive amount of violence since then within the title of a vengeful God and different ideologies. “That is larger than simply me,” Rushdie tells his spouse within the trauma ward. “It’s a few bigger topic.” The topic—the concept for which Rushdie almost died—is the liberty to say what he desires. It’s below as a lot stress at this time as ever—from fanatics of each sort, governments, companies, the suitable, the left, and the detached. Rushdie survived, however he has too many scars to make sure that the concept will. This e-book is his method of preventing again: “Language was my knife.”
Whenever you purchase a e-book utilizing a hyperlink on this web page, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.
